So I want te find the most feature rich smartwatch that doesn’t send data to the manufacure. I have tried the Pinetime watch, but it died after 6 months.

Infinitytime (OS) was not realy that feature rish, so I want to secrufise an Open Source watch OS. But I still want to connect it with Open Source software, like gadged bridge.

What is my best option under €200? Maybe the Xioami Mi band 7 (€50) that is supported by gadgedbrigde?

  • noodlejetski@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    anything that’s compatible with Gadgetbridge should be okay. it keeps everything on your phone and doesn’t even request a network permission, so the device can’t phone home.

    incidentally, I’ve got the Mi Band 7 (connected via Gadgetbridge] and I quite like it.

  • Uranium 🟩@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Personally this has been the most feature rich/open source one I could find, and it’s what I ended up going for, there’s an opensource app store, direct integration with gadgetbridge, a decent always on display much like the amazfit bip S, which also means a long battery life.

    https://banglejs.com/

    • notmyredditusername@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is pretty amazing, I was not expecting it to be such a reasonable price considering the specs. What’s the battery life like?

      • Uranium 🟩@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It can get up to 4 weeks, though my experience is closer to 4 days to a couple of weeks, I think it depends heavily on what apps you’re using, how much you’re moving about and how much stuff you’re installing

    • DeltaTangoLima@reddrefuge.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Shit! You just reminded me I have a Pebble Time, sitting in a drawer. I remember it being such a good watch, then I got distracted by the Samsung watch at the time.

      Might see if there’s any life in it and test it out with GadgetBridge.

        • DeltaTangoLima@reddrefuge.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Thanks for that. Came across Rebble while searching for answers to problems getting the Pebble working with GB earlier today, so definitely looks like it’s worth a go.

  • TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    No smartwatch. Fact is, you do not need a smartwatch. Buy an authentic analog watch. For the same price as one of these mediocre or expensive smartwatches, you can get a sustainable, repairable, durable and classy watch that can last 20-50 years easily. Coin cell battery lasts over 5 years.

    Smartwatches are novelty.

    For €200, you can get a Seiko, Citizen, Casio Edifice or whatnot.

    • Fisch@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Smartwatches do have features an analog watch doesn’t have. I’m pretty sure OP already knows about the existence of analog watches.

      • TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        What features are these, that are useful and not novelty for the first 2 weeks of “new shiny product” honeymoon period?

        • raven [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Reading my blood sugar off my CGM without taking my insulin pump out of my pocket is huge actually. I’m using a $25 pinetime for that.

          • TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            You could get a blood sugar reading device like AccuChek that is far, far superior, and lasts for decades. It samples your blood and is the size of a couple small smartphones, is repairable and durable. Not to mention, about as accurate as it gets commercially.

            The machine costs $10 with 10 vial strips. A 50 strip vial pack costs ~$14. The machine is made for medical usage.

            • raven [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I guess you don’t know what a Continuous Glucose Monitor is. It’s a medical device that is attached to my arm with an adhesive pad that monitors my blood sugar continuously, and reports it over bluetooth to my phone. What you’re talking about is a glucometer which I also have (freestyle lite)

              • TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                What is the need for a CGM? My grandma is far more ill than you ever could be, and she does not require a CGM, even though her blood sugar levels can fall off to 20-30 at times. Diagnosing yourself periodically should be the norm, as opposed to hooking yourself up with a statistical machine for something like this.

                Misunderstood the phrasing.

        • bufke@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          For me it’s easily paying subway fare, seeing notifications, leaving my phone home for a quick errand (but could make a call if absolutely necessary). I have a small child, so having hands free abilities is great. If I could degoogle it and run only open source linux/android, I would. But nfc payments will never work with such a thing even if the software existed.

          • TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            There are not many people that can be so crafty and clever with making use of these shiny novelty gadgets. If you really are in the teeny tiny percentage of people that genuinely leverage them to improve life quality, only then is it worth for you to buy these things.

            Most people, unlike you, simply do not leverage them, and purchase them as a trashy substitute for a great traditional longlasting watch, or as a fashion/trend accessory.

    • BelieveRevolt [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is the correct answer. I used to wear a smartwatch before realizing most of the features were useless or actively annoying, and a regular watch will tell me the time just as well and doesn’t need to constantly be charged. Do you really want your wrist to buzz every time you get an e-mail? If you’re going to spend €50 on a smartwatch, spend it on a Casio instead, that’s what I did and it’s much better value for money.

      • TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Spent about $150 on an Edifice back during high school days. I graduated from college. This thing still works amazingly, though I have gotten bored and now want to change it. Wondering what would be good, analog Edifice/Seiko, G-Shock or a Casio terrorist watch.