New account since lemmyrs.org went down, other @Deebsters are available.

  • 0 Posts
  • 33 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: October 16th, 2023

help-circle












  • I see your point, but you likely also need to be compiling multiple versions for different architectures and OSes. If you offer an exe someone will turn up asking for a msi, etc, etc.

    In theory, you can get this automated, but then you’re requiring a dev to learn and maintain these tools instead of working on their project.

    I do edit and spell check my posts because I believe that when posting something (text, software, etc) it’s proper to make it easy to consume, without forcing dozens/hundreds/thousands of people to fix your errors. I would expect these things, but I don’t demand these things, and I think it’s inexcusably entitled for anyone to do so.


  • What I’m hearing is you’d rather that the developer used their time to produce binaries so you don’t need to spend your own time.

    The problem with open source is that people expect a lot time and effort to go into things like bug fixes, documentation and support, when often the devs start out making something to scratch a personal itch. They then share it for the benefit of others, and it can be a slippery slope where you can end up with a second job, except you don’t get paid or even thanked.

    Open source burnout is a big problem.






  • Deebster@programming.devtoSelfhosted@lemmy.worldJoplin alternative?
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    It’s a very different kind of beast, but I’m very much enjoying it so far. Linking things is definitely Joplin’s weak point whereas this is a core strength for logseq.

    I often used bullet points in my Joplin notes, so having that as the default works for me too. However, since Op has said they want plain text notes Obsidian seems like a better fit (although logseq does save pages as text it’s not what it feels like in use).