We really hope that codeberg and forgejo is accepted and used more!
Plural and not human, don’t refer to us with any human-related words or include us in humanity in any way. First ‘person’ pronouns will change based on who/what is talking.
Ask more questions, assume less.
We really hope that codeberg and forgejo is accepted and used more!
That isn’t really what I was talking about, but I understand the confusion.
I meant the people utilising the platform to upload videos etc to get paid.
How is it different to other fedi projects/instances surviving off of donations?
Most will likely block the adverts anyway, so I fail to see how it’ll make money that way.
Why not just pay them? I feel like fedi is based more on that than ads, a lot of us on fedi hate ads.
So no, and it doesn’t even appear to be on that list.
Cool, seems like eventually they will.
As with reddit / lemmy, I doubt a viable alternative will emerge until youtube has become well and truly offensive.
Even after it has this is very unlikely because part of the appeal of youtube is getting paid for work and most people either don’t have the money to pay for it, choose not to or hate the platforms through which creators ask to get paid through.
Like it or not, either it’ll be another tech company who will later do this exact same thing or we need more people willing to pay and less shitty platforms through which they can do so i.e. not VC backed/supported.
Have they added safety features like denying follows yet?
Also, they really need to create apps for all platforms, this would increase their popularity and usability.
Some piped instances are still working, thankfully.
There isn’t one.
Because none of them have all features.
My favourites however are Fractal for desktop and Fluffychat for mobile because they both allow for multiple accounts in one window/app and they look nice, and Fluffychat has features that make it more customisable.
deleted by creator
There was supposed to be goldfish, but I’m not sure what happened to it.
Yes and no.
Reclaiming a word can only be done by those who are affected by it negatively and it should always be used in a positive way by people attempting reclaiming, never negatively. I’ve seen no evidence of them doing this or of them ever being affected by that word negatively personally.
Also intent is not magical, it doesn’t absolve people of the hurt they cause by doing something, all it might do is explain they weren’t trying to be cruel, however that doesn’t magically absolve anyone of anything and if they carry on doing it regardless of hurting someone etc, then they show their intent was really not what they claim it was.
Even if that’s the case, that still makes it an immature name for what should be a serious project, because I doubt they’ve ever seriously engaged with the concept outside of them naming their project that, hey that’s an idea!
Like, I don’t mind fun. But as someone into kink too, the name of a project shouldn’t invoke anything to do with either ableism or BDSM, especially since kink is not understood by most people correctly, unless a project is related to kink in some way, or ableism (which I’m going to seriously be suspicious of your project and motivations unless you’re disabled and are reclaiming it) it’s still a very bad name that doesn’t really explain anything about it at a glance/first hearing it.
That would have been a good idea, but alas they think they have good reasons for not doing so. Which, they don’t as their argument isn’t really sound, but people have their strongly held convictions even if they’re incorrect especially when it comes to foss projects, lol.
Glad you have something else good to use!
Yeah. It could have done if some not very nice people hadn’t have attacked them constantly just because they didn’t like what they were trying to do.
What are you trying to prove here? They were asked to change it because it’s ableist and they said no because it’s funny. Giving me a definition does not refute that.
That’s great! Now if only they’d stop thinking disability is funny, they might have a program worth using!
Not inherently.
People do share music there though, both free and non-free even though it’s technically not allowed to share the latter.
That’s fair. Eventually hopefully forgejo will work well enough to provide an alternative for self hosting though.