French companies seem to be biting though so it seems they think there’s danger of it being passed? This is also the country whose courts decided to force Quad9 to block their entire country because the alternative was to start telling their French users which websites they’re allowed to visit based on what private companies say should be banned.

I don’t think the French know how to Internet.

Spectacle is nice but if I haven’t restarted the PC for a few days, it takes about a minute to react to the hotkey

You can’t really force other people’s servers to delete messages on any platform though. Nor can you force it in other people’s clients even if they’re on your server.

Judged by what it does, not how it was written. The “AI slop” label is rampant — Flathub PR queues, Reddit, everywhere — and it routinely dismisses good software with no actual review behind it. FlatPark refuses that reflex: every app here was built, run, and reviewed against a published bar — the only labels we apply are ones we can defend

Was it all reviewed by the same LLM that wrote all the text on the website?

Autocomplete in your favourite IDE is basically AI assisted too.

I think a reasonable line in the sand is: Does the author of the PR understand what they’re doing with this PR and how/why it works? If the PR is complex (like a whole new feature) then the author should be challenged on parts of it even if it looks OK at first glance.