Source-available ≠ open source
Source-available ≠ open source
some people just want to see the world
BOOBS
BOOBS
BOOBS
BOOBS
BOOBS
BOOBS
BOOBS
BOOBS
BOOBS
BOOBS
BOOBS
BOOBS
BOOBS
From that company you love to hate:
Apple Releases Open Source AI Models That Run On-Device
Believe it or not, Apple has been, historically, one of the largest and consistent contributors to a number of open source projects for decades. Yes, Apple does a lot of… problematic stuff and deserves a lot of the criticism it receives, but, to their credit, they do support the FOSS community in many ways, and always have, especially by open-sourcing many of their own technologies, albeit often quietly.
There’s WebKit, HTML, OpenGL (to which they were to primary contributors for almost a decade in the mid 00s-10s). They also are pretty much the only ones who decide new emojis and always have been since the other 5 or 6 UNICODE emoji board members don’t care to contribute.
Edit:
a list of current FOSS projects at Apple
Apple at GitHub:
More repos of older projects:
Damn Bill Gates tryin’ to get them 486 chips in me!
The 90s were a different time. Believe me, I used to work Dell tech support in the Win9x days…
Oh, great. Now it’s able to copy being lazy and confused, too. Fuck!
lmao… when you give an LLM unlimited power and an ill-defined role, it assumes the position of a shitty project manager, of course
• Firefox now supports creating and using passkeys stored in the iCloud Keychain on macOS.
woohoo!
Loads fine on Mlem on my iPhone
what, no SysRq?
boo!
the sheer longevity of some xkcd comic in-jokes is really impressive.
edit: this one is over 15 years old (xkcd 327 - ‘Exploits of a Mom’ - 10/10/2007)
“I’ll be sure to get right on that first thing in the morning. Have a great evening!”
FreedomGloryActOf2023.exe
also suggesting that those beans could have been found in a nebula, dick