Thanks! I didn’t know this existed. It’d solve a lot of my grief with AI coding if we just added transparency like this.

I think NGram has a good point. Your conversation style is a contributing factor. You’ll engage in all kinds of arguments about details. Sometimes the dialogue drifts to a personal level… And that just ends you up at opposing sides with other people. And tricky discussions about disagreements.

We can have a bit of control here. Usually good advise is to focus on positivity. Talk more to people when you think it’ll lead to something constructive. Cut conversations short if you think they don’t go anywhere… At least that’s how I do it. Not all the time. I also love picking fights (sometimes). But it is a bit tricky to judge what’s a reflection to own conversation style, what’s legitimate opinion and what’s just wrong facts. If we even know the real deal.

And then AI is a polarizing topic. People have strong opinions towards it, for good reasons. And we’ll read about all of them on most online discussion places.

Yes. OP is fine as per the community rules. I was going for how there isn’t disclosure on the project page. It’s just in a post which is a reply to another post. So only Lemmy users will know. But maybe that’s alright.

Yeah, I think the room is divided. You got a lot of upvotes. In fact I think you mainly got upvoted?!? Seems those people think you did alright. Some people also disliked something about it.

Sometimes you can’t make them all happy. I’d say be as transparent as possible. Just be honest. It doesn’t really matter whether random internet people think you are. What matters is what you are. And you’re the one person who knows the facts. Just be genuine and upfront. Set your assistant to reveal itself in the commits. Add information in the Readme about what’s AI and what’s human. Add a paragraph on if you’re planning to maintain the project (you did that). That way everyone knows what to expect. And then have fun coding stuff. Stay positive. If a handful of people tell you they’re using your stuff and they’re glad it exists, you probably contributed something to the world.

Edit: Similarly, if someone like me decides to question your coding style, you’re free to have a conversation about it. Or decide not to discuss it. That’s up to you. I just opened a conversation. And by your usage of words like “fuck” and “shit” I figured you’d be open to a more direct conversation style, so I just skipped polishing my sentences and just straight up said what’s on my mind.

I feel in this case you should just publish it on Github anyway. But skip the advertisement post in some general Lemmy community. I think that’s a good compromise. And transparency is very welcome. It doesn’t feel that way in some public discussion by random people online. But we also got a lot of people who appreciate it.

As far as I remember we had a hunch you weren’t completely honest with us because some of the code and design smells of AI as well. The rest is just crazy, like the spacebar and enter key on your keyboard are jammed.

And not sure if disclosing it in some reply is all that great. IMO there should be a “co-authored by …-AI” in the commits. And transparency in the Readme, where people actively look for that kind of information. You didn’t do that.

I’d say there’s likely something wrong with your service. Maybe it refuses serving on a domain it’s not configured for? Or there’s something wrong with the headers or something like that. Or the internal network. Anyway, the 502 error is sent by the Caddy server. That means everything from your browser to the Caddy server should be fine. You can reach it. There’s something wrong with the service or the parts in-between the reverse proxy and the application.

Yeah, they probably bought 2 RAM sticks and think they can now manipulate markets with a Lemmy post and turn it into a great investment.

Removed by mod

Make sure to tell us what was written, drawn or calculated by an AI.

Maybe as another option, you could try to find a few other students and pool your money for a shared VPS? Back then I used to share an internet connection with few people to make it more affordable. We also used to share some storage space for stuff and the CS students did a website and an internal message board. I’m old, though. No clue how they do it as of today.

LLM plugins should be available in standard spamfilters like Rspamd. Some mail servers like Stalwart have it as well. You pick a prompt and provide it with an OpenAI-compatible endpoint and it’ll ask the AI for every mail. Can be a local model.

Not sure if it’s in the Email clients as well. I found a few Thunderbird addons, but that was just a quick Google search.

There’s always interest in sources. Otherwise you’d be the only one able to self-host the software. 😉

Could you please post this to the correct community? It’s a desktop application. Not something running on a server.

Also it’d be way better if you added transparency to the commits, with what’s coded by AI and what’s not. Currently it’s all mixed up.

Just to add a reference time frame: late 2022 was when ChatGPT got released. I think all these models predate the general population even being aware of AI.

Someone ping me once the IFM releases the training data for K2 Horizons and I’ll add it to the list. Currently it says “training data will be released to the public” and I can’t find any big downloads, so it’s not open-source yet.

But sure, big achievement. We only got a handful somewhat recent, usable in size/performance, true open-source LLMs.

Guess if it works, you don’t really need fail2ban as f2b pretty much does the same job. I mean it can do more, but you don’t really need to protect against PHP issues, broken wordpress plugins etc since none of that is part of Authelia.

I use fail2ban, as I have SSH running and several other services exposed which come with default fail2ban configurations. And I never got crowdsec running properly. So I skipped it. I think frequent updates and all those things are more important than a web application firewall anyway.

Authelia should come with rate limiting to protect against brute-force attacks. That could be enough.

I’d generally advise to make sure such protection actually works. Like look up the limits and try to login with a wrong password 30 times… Especially if you added stuff on top (fail2ban, crowdsec…). Has happened to me I misconfigured stuff and it didn’t limit anything… Now I check to make sure for important bits like an authentication service.

I think a lot of backup programs offer encrypted backups. You enable that and it gets encrypted before being transferred to the remote machine.

I’m sorry. For some reason we’re completely talking past each other… Your harddisk/ssd/usb-stick is a document based database afaik. You store data in form of files/documents on your HDD. It’s a bit like a library, yes. Those documents are organzed a certain way. In folders… maybe on shelves or whatever the digital equivalent is…
The important parts of a wiki (the articles with the interesting information in them) are organized exactly the same way. That’s why DokuWiki manages to pull it off without a relational database. It really doesn’t matter for something like an encyclopedia or knowledge database. Can be articles in a books sitting on shelves in some building. Or digital files on a server, organized by a very similar hierarchy / topics. …And because that’s a subset of what a relational database can do, you can use them as well! (Edit: Not sure if my terminology is 100% correct… we also have the word: hierarchical databases? could also be what I mean.)

…Sorry for the AI confusion on my side…