What type of quality guarantee should I add to my human coded repos? Is “human coded” the guarantee? Seems odd.

What type of quality guarantee are you looking for? That’s not something normally found in oss land. Feels like AI use would drag the quality up, not down, in my experience.

Does this mean it’s bad?

where I am not able to fix my setup without relying on AI.

I’m basically there. I don’t have the time to fix if something goes wrong. If AI were suddenly unavailable, and everything started going haywire with my cluster, I’d shut it down and go back to using other peoples computers (cloud).

But that can’t and won’t happen.

I have not tried v4.1. I typically wait until there’s a “recipe” someone else makes that makes it easy to load on my devices. Haven’t looked yet but those lag for a week or more.

I use massive amounts of AI for home lab dev and operations. It’s an incredible tech that unlocks so much for homelab devs. I never would have the time or patience to build out an entire system like I have now.

It has allowed me to de-google my life completely now. I run SSO with a mail server, file server, gitea, arr stack, immich for photos, and dozens more things. The whole stack monitors and acts on alerts by itself. Quite wild.

I use a couple DGX Spark boxes for inference. Currently running Deepseek v4 Flash 0731.

I have zero reliance on big tech now (aside from the annoying Google sso; that will take time to migrate away from).

So yes, I use AI just a tad. It would be foolish not to.

Some background: I’ve been a professional software dev/arch for 35 years.

Why?

But “you would have to reverse engineer binaries” is objectively false, since packages are source.

I agree on your other point, but you really should edit the misinformation.

What does it do?

Seriously? That’s what the article is about. You just have to click the link and skim it.

To each their own I suppose. I truly can’t imagine being without this productivity booster. I had the same opinion as you a year ago, but things have radically changed the last 6 months.

Tools giving incorrect answers isn’t some new thing that AI delivered.

AI makes stuff up and random dude on Stackoverflow posts incorrect answers. I see no difference here.

This programmer used it the same way I do. As a tool. It’s a great tool; I find it hard to go back to being without it.

Yeah I know gitea has a mature api and I suspect it’s GitHub compatible. So any mid level dev should smash it out. Especially now with a little help from a magic pattern machine.

From a source code perspective, moving is as easy as pushing it to another platform. Everything uses git under the hood.

However, all the project mgmt stuff like issues and PRs and releases aren’t as easy

Fiat money is devalued by the issuer to benefit them. And there’s no web of trust. You trust the issuer or you don’t.

Precisely actually. Except with nakamoto consensus on top to order the commits.

What problem does it solve where? It’s an immutable data ledger. It solves trustless interactions.

Raising capital, trading, etc. it moves financial markets from proprietary pay to play arenas (wall st), to an open model.

If you hate money and markets, you’ll hate it too. But it does solve worldwide instantaneous value transfer.

Funny how crypto is an amazing example of an entire infrastructure and service layer going FOSS and fully decentralized, and open source capitalist haters still despise it.

Aaaaahhh

Box is a bad example; it always has a value and can’t be unwrapped. It’s Result<T> and Option<T> that are the primary wrappers.

Result is for Errors, and Option is for nullables. If you consider it that way, the “issues” with unwrap are identical to other languages when errors and nulls aren’t properly handled.

“Hired”

Took me a min too. I kept wanting to go with fired also

Look no further than Lightshot. It’s free, it can replace the PrntScn button. It lets you draw a rectangle, then add arrows, lines, text, then either copy to clipboard or save to disk.

Then it disappears. No unneeded prompts, no wasting your time, no ads, no upsells. Nothing. Lightweight, simple, and free. It’s like a throwback to the 90’s freeware.

As a software developer working with QA and often having to explain things to others as well, I’ve used this for years. It is the most optimal and efficient software for this purpose.