Don’t we already have this all of our file browsers and archive browsers?

That applies even to you.

This hits hard.

Not that I don’t like my job, just that I love my costly side-project more.

Not to mention that sometimes, the code that’s supposed to “speak for itself” doesn’t do the things that they think it would do.

It clearly says 1

Use code formatting, perhaps?

Not suspicious at all.

Time for a fork, then?

And even the blobs in the first point there are source and build instructions in their respective folder.

No it is not. It is supposedly the built result based on the instruction provided. If they can just provide that instruction, why not provide the source as well?

The issue thread also highlights the stubbornness and hostility of the project maintainer toward possible contributors.

So I would presume this libre alternative would have all the assets free, no?

That link is broken…

Anything can be a square hole if you’re brave enough.

i knew i should’ve gone with roundpack instead :(

Who hate flatpak?

Maybe KDE?

Also I find Debian documentations are pretty lackluster.

As long as you don’t ask for coffee.

No, I said OpenWRT is designed exactly for embedded, and the use case calls for anything but.

I don’t know… At this point might as well use something not designed for embedded. Debian comes to mind. Or Alpine if you want something more minimalist.

Eternity.

It’s not perfect, tho.

How is this possible? Some random gal’s github shows up?