Indeed, it turns out that high quality content is high effort, and therefore has a weaker ROI. I know it’s simply game theory, I just hate this particular game.
Indeed, it turns out that high quality content is high effort, and therefore has a weaker ROI. I know it’s simply game theory, I just hate this particular game.
When will humans stop enjoying painfully staged videos like this? Like, who tilts the object away from themself but towards the camera to check why it’s not working?
Agreed, numpy really could/should be built in.
Why would it be a bad sign that the language has built in tools for common things you need to do?
I’ll drop JetBrains the moment something smarter comes out, but so far nothing has reached that level of code analysis.
Yo dawg I heard you liked gatekeeping so I got you a gate to keep your gatekeepers.
Nothing, just use a good tool for the job, whatever that job requires.
Woah MIT license. That’s a lot more permissive than I expected.
Man, I have two competing takes on this…
The statement “stupid people always say no” doesn’t prevent other classifications of people from saying no as well. Therefore someone saying “no” doesn’t give you any information on whether or not they are stupid.
And
All humans are obviously stupid, lol
The Intuitive Machines lander issue was that no one disarmed the safety switch on the laser guidance system. (No, really!) Luckily NASA had a backup system installed that ended up working better anyway.
To be fair, I think the majority of stand up comedians are also painful to listen to.
But you’re right, this is an exaggerated caricature of reality, like Monty Python or the Three Stooges but far less so.