• HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        18 days ago

        Yeah looks to me like scaling artifacts from shrinking the image. AFAIK AI isn’t that consistent especially with high contrast shapes.

          • m532@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            18 days ago

            We have harnessed the power of intelligence in our own machines by replicating a part of the brain. The intelligence is artificial, making it “Artificial Intelligence”. The name is exactly what it does.

            You claim to know that it can never be art? If art had limits, it wouldn’t be art.

          • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            18 days ago

            AI being appropriated for neural nets which might even do things unrelated to what we think of as intelligence is annoying, I’ll give you that.

            What art is is kind of a huge can of worms, though. In any case it’s pretty clear they can satisfy potential clients a lot better than human digital artists, though, and that’s where at least part of the butthurt comes from.

            • Kuori [she/her]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              18 days ago

              What art is is kind of a huge can of worms

              that’s true but i’m passing positive that if you asked a hundred thousand people to define art not a single one would say something like

              [art is when an algorithm is able to] satisfy potential clients a lot better than human digital artists

              • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                18 days ago

                Agreed. The point being that people aren’t really upset about whether it’s art or not. They’re mad about money.

                And that’s not exactly dumb either, making bread is important. It’d just be nice if it was admitted to.

          • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            18 days ago

            If we did what they wanted, I couldn’t afford the clothes I’m wearing. Or probably a lot of other things - shit tons has improved since the late 1700’s.

            Sure, there’s less weaver jobs now, and there will be less digital artist jobs in the future. Arguably, the past few centuries have shown that if there’s other things that we can do instead, it’s still for the best. (If there’s not, a whole new conversation opens up)