• r00ty@kbin.life
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      No. Both UDP and TCP can be intercepted the same. The difference is that UDP sends a packet to an address. But doesn’t have any in built system to check that it arrived, that it arrived intact or to resend if it didn’t. There’s also no built in way to protect against spoofing or out of order packet delivery. But generally implementations will handle the ones that are important of those themselves.

      TCP establishes a circuit, packets are sent, verified and resent if required until the original data, in the correct order is delivered to the application. Also there is some protection against spoofing with sequence numbering. The downside is that time sensitive data might be delayed because of the retransmission and re-assembling. Which is why time sensitive streams like VoIP are usually sent over UDP.

        • r00ty@kbin.life
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, this is a known interoperability thing between kbin and lemmy. So, I’m afraid I can’t give you this week’s lottery numbers ahead of time.

    • Clent@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      No. UDP is at the packet level. Interception is a different layer.

      To use to today’s language, UDP yeets the packets at you as fast as it can generate them.

      It doesn’t care if you catch any of them.

      Don’t yeet the baby.