Atuin replaces your existing shell history with a SQLite database, and records additional context for your commands. With this context, Atuin gives you faster and better search of your shell history!

Additionally, it provides optional and fully encrypted (E2EE) synchronisation of your history between machines, via an Atuin server, or you can self-host your own server. There is a single command to easily delete your data from the server too.

It supports zsh, bash, fish, and nushell shells right now.

The search is as easy as pressing the up arrow in the terminal and then scrolling back, or typing to search. But you could also type something like this to do a search [search for all successful make commands, recorded after 3pm yesterday atuin search --exit 0 --after “yesterday 3pm” make].

Atuin offers configurable full text or fuzzy search, filterable by host, directory, etc. As it has context around dates, times, exit code, and even the directory location form where a command was executed, you could use the -c flag to just search for commands run in a particular directory.

The sync function allows you to have the same history across terminals, across sessions, and across machines.

There is a quick start script that can be run to install it, otherwise you can also install from the various Linux repos. For manual installation, the steps I found to get going were:

  • Install Ble.sh and add it to your .bashrc (or other shell) file
  • Install Atuin and add it to your .bashrc (or other shell) file (after Ble.sh)
  • Restart your shell and run ‘atuin import bash’ to import my bash history into Atuin
  • Press up arrow to see if Atuin interactive search triggers

The link below has some good documentation as well a link to their source code.

See https://atuin.sh/

#technology #Linux #opensource

  • taladar@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    Syncing shell history between machines seems like an incredibly bad idea considering how many commands are specific to one host and not having all the commands from other hosts in the history makes it so much easier to find them again in the history. Maybe I am thinking about this too much from a cross-platform and server viewpoint though.

    • GadgeteerZA@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      You can though search, hit TAB, and then do edits to the line before executing. That is pretty handy if it is something complex across a few machines with a specific change.

      • taladar@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yeah, but lets say I have two servers, one hosts matomo.foo.com and the other hosts matomo.bar.com and I want to update each of those for the second time (the commands are already in the history from last time), with sync I would have to pay much more attention to get the correct commands from the history when I recall the commands for upgrading the database in the correct vhost dir for each (some php matomo.php core:upgrade or similar invocation using a script in the vhost dir), especially when it is mixed in with commands from 50 other servers.

        Or lets say I run some dangerous command on the dev server (DROP DATABASE), without sync I can never accidentally use it from the history on the live server.