• not_woody_shaw@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Reminds me of the KSP2 fiasco. Management insisting on reusing the engine from the old game, and firing all the senior devs who could have told them there was no possibility of getting the features they’d announced to work without rewriting the engine from scratch.

    • zurohki@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      They also wouldn’t allow the new devs to talk to the old devs, so they had to figure out the old codebase for themselves.

    • PlexSheep@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      It’s so sad what happened with KSP2, we were all so excited at the start. I’m glad I didn’t buy it though

          • SaintWacko@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            Do people not? I love the challenge of designing efficient craft that can complete multiple missions at once!

          • KISSmyOS@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            Career mode was all I ever played, really. It gives you more limits on what you can build, so just adding more delta-V isn’t a possible cop-out for all missions.

        • PlexSheep@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Sure they didn’t plan to add one? I was devastated when they didn’t even have science at first, and of course all the bugs.

          Slay the Kraken? More like return of the Kraken.

          The roadmap seemed good, but it was too good to be true. Im still excited for multiplayer, but it won’t happen