alphacyberranger@sh.itjust.works to Programmer Humor@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year agoBefore or Aftersh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square38linkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1imageBefore or Aftersh.itjust.worksalphacyberranger@sh.itjust.works to Programmer Humor@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square38linkfedilink
minus-squarelowleveldata@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 year agoSuggesting examples are not the same as explaining and therefore the interviewee will not be hired and therefore it is not a deadlock
minus-squareSzethFriendOfNimi@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·edit-21 year agoDeadlock resolved Iamdevloper has been chosen as the deadlock victim by lowleveldata
minus-squareCaptainSpaceman@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 year ago Suggesting examples are not the same as explaining But the interviewee didnt suggest an example, they merely attempted to create a deadlock. However, in their attempt to do so they imply that they CAN explain a deadlock and therefore should get the job. The interviewer doesnt ask for an explanation, only if the interviewee is able to provide one.
minus-squarelowleveldata@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 year agoI have a feeling that you have to do better than “implying” you know something to land a job
minus-squareRampsquatch@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 year agoThat’s not possible. Everything on the internet is super serious.
minus-squarelowleveldata@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 year agoJust curious about what makes you think that I’m not taking it as a joke?
minus-squarekautau@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 year agoYour first comment was how logically this was an incorrect action that wouldn’t, in fact, land the employee a job. We all get that, that’s why it’s a joke
Suggesting examples are not the same as explaining and therefore the interviewee will not be hired and therefore it is not a deadlock
Deadlock resolved
Iamdevloper has been chosen as the deadlock victim by lowleveldata
But the interviewee didnt suggest an example, they merely attempted to create a deadlock.
However, in their attempt to do so they imply that they CAN explain a deadlock and therefore should get the job.
The interviewer doesnt ask for an explanation, only if the interviewee is able to provide one.
I have a feeling that you have to do better than “implying” you know something to land a job
I have a feeling this post is a joke
That’s not possible. Everything on the internet is super serious.
Just curious about what makes you think that I’m not taking it as a joke?
Your first comment was how logically this was an incorrect action that wouldn’t, in fact, land the employee a job. We all get that, that’s why it’s a joke