It is.

Blazor is a big framework. It gives you a lot, but as a framework, also introduces stack complexity.

Being able to code on one C# codebase for a web application client and server is great. It’s very fast. You can use modern C# syntax. You have component (CSS) isolation. You can switch and mix between runtime targets (server dom rendering and sending diff-updates or client-side app execution).

At work, we’re using it for a webportal/webapp and I have not fundamentally regretted us using it. It’s definitely not worse than anything else. For a productive development and product there’s a little bit of framework knowledge you have to learn, but that’s not different than any other framework. And docs are very good.

I love how fast it feels to use the end product too.

I actually implemented super tic tac toe in Blazor a while ago. It’s interesting to play.

Why do I not win with a row on the outer field?

It counts won fields instead?

Krita doesn’t have an Android app version though, does it?

The link offers a download instead of serving an HTML? I’m on mobile Firefox (I doubt it matters).

I don’t think it should be a client feature. It should be federated, like the posts are.

I feel like cross-posts should share comment threads…

Now comment threads are split across 6 communities.

it’s not yet the suggested version. Meaning that brave users need to install this manually for now

not production-/stable-live yet

deleted by creator

it often gets caught pulling anti-user shenanigans

I’m not aware. Can you list a few?

Receiving funding doesn’t necessarily mean serving. Google is interested in funding to keep it’s position. Mozilla still provides alternatives and regularly criticizes Google.

What do you mean by different companies?

You get one server or instance and pay only one company. No need for multiple different.

It’s how I intuitively read it too, even after decades of being exposed to tech, software, and licenses.

There’s the OSI Open Source Definition, which is a free software definition.

I think the free terminology is clearer because free as in beer vs freedom is more obvious. Either it has a price or it doesn’t. The Libre term is rather common alternative because of the ambiguity. The free as in beer or freedom is a common easy to understand explanation.

There’s no such things for open source. In my subjective experience at least. “Source available” did not establish like Libre. Open is way more broadly ambiguous than free. And whether a license is open or open needs a full understanding and interpretation rather than only 'does it cost or can I use it for free.

Free is a dualist ambiguous differentiation. Open is broadly ambiguous and hard to verify.

• https://www.weather.gov/documentation/services-web-api

All of the information presented via the API is intended to be open data, free to use for any purpose. As a public service of the United States Government, we do not charge any fees for the usage of this service

• https://brightsky.dev/

Bright Sky is free-to-use for all purposes

• https://www.dwd.de/EN/service/copyright/copyright_artikel.html

all spatial data and spatial data services available for free access may be used without any restrictions provided that the source is acknowledged

• https://open-meteo.com/en/pricing

Open-Meteo APIs are free for non-commercial use

…

Dunno about “usually”. There’s providers that cost and there’s providers that don’t. There’s certainly multiple free providers available.

It’s not a what-you-see-is-what-you-get editor website builder like OP seems to ask for. You definitely need some editing or at least Markdown markup.

But I personally can recommend getting into that.

If it’s mostly about the content and text content Hugo may be a very good option and starting point into website creation/development. Because it generates static webpages it can be hosted for free too - e.g. on GitHub pages.

If they want to play around, move and modify the layout and positioning though they’ll have to dive at least a little bit into HTML and CSS, or use a different tool.

You must first have Node.js installed.

That’s a heavy requirement

A minimalist novel-writing system/rich text editor designed to be usable without a mouse.

ah, it’s about writing

mh, I can’t find it anymore either. Pretty sure it was on the website, on the main or about page. I was on various other pages looking for contribution info too though. Maybe it changed? Maybe it’s now considered t obe out of beta?

I don’t see where I can submit titles on a video page?

For SponsorBlock there’s a button in the video player toolbar.

The demo video shows a button on the video description title. But I don’t see one (on a video that has no DeArrow data yet).

Are submissions not open yet?

/edit: Since my comment I’ve seen it on video pages a while later. Dunno if it was a technical issue, delay, account moderation, or video / channel specific or what.

This extension is free, forever, for anyone who installs it during the beta. Yes, that means there will be a paywall for new users only in the future, but I promise that there will still be a way to for people to get free access. Of course the extension will always remain fully open source, with a publicly downloadable database, just like SponsorBlock.

I’m a bit confused what this means / will mean. A paywall but also still alternative free access?