I have birds, nuff said

  • 0 Posts
  • 13 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 12th, 2023

help-circle

  • you lost me at " Many years ago I posted that I could not see anything wrong about sex between an adult and a child, if the child accepted it.

    Through personal conversations in recent years, I’ve learned to understand how sex with a child can harm per psychologically. This changed my mind about the matter: I think adults should not do that. I am grateful for the conversations that enabled me to understand why."

    the guy did NOT change his mind, hes scared of getting caught and called out for being a pedo, necrophiliac, and enjoying bestiality

    Stallman remarked most recently on the subject of pornography featuring humans and animals in 2018:

    Prudish censorship attacks again in the UK, convicting someone for possessing “extreme pornography”, including images of sex with animals.
    
    I can’t imagine a possible reason to punish people for this. The article does not report that the animals were harmed, or that they objected to the experience, or that they thought of it as sexual. The law does not consider these questions pertinent.
    
    What is, however, clear is that prohibiting the possession of copies of some image or text — no matter what that image or text may be — threatens human rights. It creates excuses to search through people’s possessions and files. It creates ways to make people vulnerable to criminal charges without their cooperation or even their knowledge. All such laws must be repealed.
    

  • Primary sources documenting Stallman’s political advocacy for:
        The normalization of sexual relations between adults and minors [1]
        Defense of individuals both accused and convicted of sexual crimes, including the rape of minors, sexual assault, and sexual harassment [2]
        Dismissal of legal norms regarding sexual assault [3]
        Dismissal of legal norms regarding sexual harassment [4]
        Support for the possession of child sexual abuse material [5]
        Legal and social normalization of sex between humans and animals [6]
        Legal and social normalization of sex with corpses (necrophilia) [7]
    Credible allegations of sexual misconduct regarding Stallman [8]
    Misconduct of the Free Software Foundation board of directors [9]
    Calls from the free software community for Stallman’s removal [10]
    Recommendations for reconciliation and closure [11]
    

    https://stallman-report.org

    fuck him, and fuck you for defending this useless waste of flesh




  • im done after this, but dont matter how many accounts you have, someone paid by google to spew their propaganda would have to have a lot of accounts, on many platforms. Now i almost want to peek around and find out just what you are really up to

    you are a fraud, i wont block you, but ill be ignoring you from now on


  • Uncle@lemmy.catoOpen Source@lemmy.ml*Permanently Deleted*
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    of course someone who is under contract is legally obligated to deny getting paid. maybe just a NDA, but either way

    and dude, not even the kid i went to school with, who invented ‘bumptop’ and sold that shit to google, eats as much of the propaganda as you have and puked it up in such perfect form. just send me a link to your handler or whatever, I can make a much more convincing account. not looking to take over your job, but i can do it better

    Edit: link to bumptop




  • Uncle@lemmy.catoOpen Source@lemmy.ml*Permanently Deleted*
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    look, im not trying to be a dick, honestly. but ive seen some of your posts here and there, and it really seems like you have a big hard on for google, like you capitalize the name and everything. someone under contract would do something like that, however auto correct will as well, but im on pc…so im bias. some of the other things you say…ok more how, but to me sounds like someone under contract.

    yeah, i could be wrong and im sorry for being a dick about it. if thats the case, you should have a look as some of the evil shit they have done, look at project dragonfly and tell me they have the users best interest at heart. I was a big google fan for many years, bought nexus phones before they changed name to pixel, was among the early adopters of gmail, (public) beta tested lots of shit. hell, i remember when the front page said “ad free”. so this isnt coming out of nowhere, i have reasons, and you should do a little research, but dont search it ON google

    Edit: deleted the shortcut for ‘ad free’, was the wrong one. will update when/if i find it…maybe Mandela effect?




  • Uncle@lemmy.catoOpen Source@lemmy.ml*Permanently Deleted*
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    either you are paid by google to make accounts seem like real people behind them, and spread propaganda for google, or you are a young kid who has yet to grasp the reality of what google is telling you they do vs what they actually do.

    Do you think the tobacco producers are spouting how great their product is at giving folks cancer? you must be too young to remember cigarette ads, and how 9 out of 10 Dr.'s recommend a particular brand of smokes.

    Google wants your information, they want to sell you shit, that is all. They will make it easier to get that data, and easier to buy from them, but dont for one second think they give one ounce of a shit about you, or your life as long as you stay on their platform and spend money on them