Which is absolutely legit. I only criticize the people releasing a “production ready” product, which is nothing but a PoC and then also claim that it is AGPL-3, while abandoning it after 2 months. This hurts the open source community imho.
Nice, another blindly generated app by Claude Code. 37 commits and already announcing it tells it all.
I can get that and I also prefer sticking to major versions. However, I am chaotic and easily have 50 different docker images, checking all the release cycle of all of those gets exhausting.
I believe I need to start generating notifications if a tag has not received an update for more than 30d.
I hate providers not offering me a latest tag. Is there any valid reason not to do that?
Even worse, super stupid version tags such as MinIO is using: RELEASE.2025-09-07T16-13-09Z-cpuv1 (I wish I made that up)
@talkingpumpkin@lemmy.world you have the genes of IE6
I am not talking about the many projects, where you have a single developer just enjoying making software, while providing it to the open source community. I have zero expectations to those projects.
I am talking about people promoting their open source products. Making a fancy website. Act professionally. All this behavior causes people to have expectations. So why invest time into promoting it in the first place? There is literally no need to do this, expect for the owner to attract more and more people.
Don’t promise a sky scraper if you can only maintain a bungalow.