the church of uncle bob would like to speak to you about the sins of commenting.
the church of uncle bob would like to speak to you about the sins of commenting.
they were never meant to be together, they would confuse the hell out of each other. Imagine they have two kids and she says pick kid[1] from the school, then what?
given that LLMs and gen AIs are great at talking bullshit and creating presentations, one is a more realistic expectation than the other
The obvious solution is parsing jsons with gpus? maybe not…
I invite op to Turkey
for me when that happens, it usually turns out to be a simple but stupid mistake on my end
yes he does, I have seen him do it all the time. shame on him
or you know…use valgrind and lots of lots of tests to be ~%85 safe
“John Tromp and Peter Österlund estimated the number of legal chess positions with a 95% confidence level at ( 4.822 ± 0.028 ) × 10^44, based on an efficiently computable bijection between integers and chess positions.”
%95 confidenece level? Did they make a poll?
what if you write an algorithm that will produce the necessary code for each possible move, so you don’t have to type them all manually
C++ and C compilers are much more friendly now a days
Thanks! by the way I meant I tried visual studio back in uni and always assumed vscode would be sth similar but now I realize not
Thanks for the suggestions. I have not tried the recent vscode. I had tried it way back in uni and really didn’t like it at the time so never tried it again but I have also heard positive things about it from some other people so probably time to reevaluate. I think for me, must haves are: it must work with python and C minimal. Autocompletion, function definition, goto, code linting are the first things that come to mind (don’t need debugger and I guess that is not an editor’s job, python has its own module and for C there is gdb for advanced needs). In VIM, I could achieve these via plugins ofcourse.
I also haven’t tried Helix but Neovim was on my mind for a while. Are Helix and Neovim different from each other in terms of editor mode styles? I will also check Pulsar (continuation of Atom), hopefully soon I will get an editor that I feel at home with.
maybe a couple years ago but for instance I think AI is definitely becoming more realistically applicable with each iteration. It could definitely be used more to remove some of the boiler plates in coding, like simple unit tests etc.
Also there are IDEs which are very good for their specific languages but I feel like it is hard to find a reliable editor that has core IDE capabilities for many languages (like go to function definitions, code linting etc). I even started using VIM because of this but I just can’t get used to modal editors and feel like there is no point in using VIM if I am only using %5 of its capabilities.
I was kind of put off when I saw collaborative mode, office channels bla bla. I guess because there is no point in trying to combine slack with a code editor. Do the code editor and do it good and that would be enough. When it is like this though, it feels like they are trying to throw in some popular stuff into the mix because it will help marketing.
Now I am feeling sorry I did not…
more =/= better quality, if anything this might suggest the opposite.
hold on mma get my vim banner and holy sword of buffering