Why do we like to pretend waterfall is this great old way to do stuff that had no problems at all?
- 1 Post
- 12 Comments
At this point if it changed it would be weird.
One aspect I feel is never talked about is that setting up the debugging more often than not takes you out of the mental space of the problem you are trying to solve. A console log is basically there already in many cases.
lorty@lemmy.mlto Open Source@lemmy.ml•Ventoy source code contains some unknown BLOBs, still no word on the issue from the dev after months3·10 months agoI mean the author has simply ignored this issue. If you look into it there are a few that people simply do not know how to generate, so without the maintainer it’s impossible to make a PR solving this.
lorty@lemmy.mlto Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml•How do you know if a tree that fell in the forest made a sound?8·2 years agoLogs? What logs?
Guess it’s not only Typescript that likes to argue with the developer while missing the entire point…
Javascript will subsume all other languages by then. Humanity won’t even know that others existed, or even what it is. It’ll just be called Script, the way you tell computers what to do when the AI doesn’t understand your prompts correctly.
The only language people don’t shit on are the ones nobody uses.
lorty@lemmy.mlto Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml•I love it when I have to scream at a computer4·2 years agoTheres a dozen of you keeping banking around the world from falling apart lol
Not a bad solution
When you are used to math equations, it’s easy to slip into that habit.
If you want to optimize to this point, do some embedded development. It’s somewhat fun to work at such a low level (testing tends to be annoying though)