OpenWebUI connected tabbyUI’s OpenAI endpoint. I will try reducing temperature and seeing if that makes it more accurate.
OpenWebUI connected tabbyUI’s OpenAI endpoint. I will try reducing temperature and seeing if that makes it more accurate.
Context was set to anywhere between 8k and 16k. It was responding in English properly, and then about halfway to 3/4s of the way through a response, it would start outputting tokens in either a foreign language (Russian/Chinese in the case of Qwen 2.5) or things that don’t make sense (random code snippets, improperly formatted text). Sometimes the text was repeating as well. But I thought that might have been a template problem, because it seemed to be answering the question twice.
Otherwise, all settings are the defaults.
I tried it with both Qwen 14b and Llama 3.1. Both were exl2 quants produced by bartowski.
Perplexica works. It can understand ollama and custom OpenAI providers.
Super useful guide. However after playing around with TabbyAPI, the responses from models quickly become jibberish, usually halfway through or towards the end. I’m using exl2 models off of HuggingFace, with Q4, Q6, and FP16 cache. Any tips? Also, how do I control context length on a per-model basis? max_seq_len in config.json?
Ah right. What I really meant to ask was if it can do protocols other than http.
Which I don’t think it can…
Are you able to tunnel ports other than 80 and 443 through Cloudflare?
The fork was originally created because upstream NewPipe elected not to include sponsor block functionality.
But wouldn’t you calculate the time in the future in the right time zone and then store it back as UTC?
Didn’t they contribute networking stuff?
Pretty sure the original developer of Infinity is one of the few people who will try to follow Reddit’s new API rules and charge a subscription fee to cover it. At least that was the case a few months ago. Not sure what’s currently happening.
You’re not incorrect. Probably all will be fixed in time.
The developer didn’t update the version string for 0.0.7. Known issue.
LLMs are statistical word association machines. Or tokens more accurately. So if you tell it to not make mistakes, it’ll likely weight the output towards having validation, checks, etc. It might still produce silly output saying no mistakes were made despite having bugs or logic errors. But LLMs are just a tool! So use them for what they’re good at and can actually do, not what they themselves claim they can do lol.