Do you really use it or are you just adding an alternative to the conversation? It is an interesting concept (commutation) but not likely to supplant git.

Only kind of. That’s a backronym.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Object_storage#History

Well I don’t use obsidian as all. But as a matter of opening and linking notes, I use this tool because I like it, and it allows me to reference two separate vaults without issue.

obsidian.nvim

I don’t either, but you don’t have to use that feature. I don’t. I just use with local db for that machine.

Also, atuin.sh.

There is no USB-B here and it is pretty hard to get the wrong direction anyway.

Six since it has A at both ends.

If you can write a moderately complex math equation in tex on the first try, you’re a programmer in my book.

Aren’t the x-suffixed files just an xml format?

My suggestion has always been universal sidereal time. It is singular, doesn’t change, and carries no colonial baggage since it rotates around the whole earth. Even suitable as a home time if we become spacefaring.

Like with everything, context matters. Sometimes it can indicate poorly structured control flow, other times inefficient loop nesting. But many times it is just somebody’s preference for guard clauses. As long as the intent is clear, there are no efficiency problems, and it is possible to reach the fewest branches necessary, I see no issues.

It runs in browsers. It… isn’t poop? I don’t know. I’m all out of ideas.

!sudo shutdown -r now. Or just :x or ZZ, but I guess those don’t fit the motif of this very tired silly joke.

This happens to me more than I care to admit. I told a coworker about a Gitlab CI issue that I’d seen a few years back and hadn’t had any action. I looked up the link to share it. Me; I opened it. Brain failing me, I had forgotten it was my issue.

I guess I’m just lucky, but I’ve gotten nothing but thoughtful support on Arch forums and Stackoverflow. If you read the article How do I ask a good question?, it works very well. It seems harsh but coming with poorly thought out questions without debugging details makes it impossible to help.

PascalCase

I’ve seen this before but don’t accept it myself. There are cases where you just wanted to cat. In this case, maybe to review the problem. Then you want to extend the command. Preserving it in the next commands where you start stacking on pipes is useful since it can be fewer strokes and maintain a habit.

I don’t disagree. I’m just saying the distribution of workload has an impact on what looks a good idea or too hard.

Fair.