Based on recent comments this feels like a discussion we should have. So…topic, basically.

I’m not looking to be chief noisemaker on this, but I stand by what I wrote in !privacy and what’s in my post history.

https://lemmy.ml/post/48724623/26190950

Let’s have at; do we want a [AI] and [NOT AI] tag. Why or why not?

  • SuspiciousCarrot78@aussie.zoneOPEnglish
    2·
    11 hours ago

    @curbstickle@anarchist.nexus - as per your suggestion, here is the AI tags discussion, which I imagine you’ve been eyeballing.

    I don’t know where this leaves the community, nor how many responders are part of the community vs lookie loos. I would have put up a staw poll but that likely wouldn’t have helped much, signal:noise wise.

    As the mod, do you have a read on all this or a preferred direction going forward?

    • curbstickle@anarchist.nexusMEnglish
      2·
      4 hours ago

      As I already mentioned, I won’t be putting anything up for the week as the other rule gets closed out to not inundate, so do not expect any action this week.

      That said, it absutely confirmed my expectations, and I’ll be looking into some automod options and discussing with the .world team to find out if there are any known issues with them, so that a few options can be presented in the next sticky.

      • SuspiciousCarrot78@aussie.zoneOPEnglish
        1·
        2 hours ago

        So state of play / preview of coming attractions - yes to tags, once tagged, cannot complain about said tagged content. Formal sticky etc next week.

        PS: I took a look at r/selfhosted - their bot seems to delete ALL new project posts and requires user to appeal / resubmit / verify directly. I think that’s problematic (and ironic, if you think about it - you’re trying to litigate ai/no ai with a bot) but not my circus, not my monkeys.