I am planning on creating a home server with either 2 (RAID1) or 3 (RAID5) HDDs as bulk storage and 1 SSD as bcache.

The question is, what file system should I use for the HDDs? I am thinking of ext4 or xfs, as I heard btrfs is not recommended for my use case for some reason.

Do you all have some advice to give on what file system to use, as well as some other tips?

  • Svinhufvud@sopuli.xyzOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    13 days ago

    Powerloss might happen as I don’t have a ups.

    And when it comes to mdadm, it just happens to be the first and only redundancy tool I know. I am however open to learn and try new things.

    ZFS seems interesting, but: I read that ZFS would require quite a lot of RAM, and I was going for 32 GBs only, would it be enough?

    • ShortN0te@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      13 days ago

      1 GB of RAM for every TB of storage is recommended but you can do with way less for ZFS.

    • Jaypg@lemmy.jaypg.pw
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 days ago

      ZFS doesn’t require a lot of RAM, but it will use more RAM if it’s available. 32G would be plenty for a home setup. I think my home file server has 24 or 32G of RAM and ZFS. If it’s important data then stick to what you know; there’s nothing wrong with mdadm.

    • KaninchenSpeed@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      12 days ago

      ZFS doesn’t require lots of RAM, more RAM just improves the caching (ARC) it can do. You can set ZFS to use all unused RAM as ARC, so it doesn’t interfere with other services running on the same PC. I ran ZFS with lots of VMs on an old office PC with 16GB RAM and it was still able to max out a 10gig nic.